Saturday, February 18, 2017

A reminder: Trump's Dangerous War on Cities, and Why a National ID is Inevitable Under This Administration

Time to revisit a key concept: 

How Trump is making U.S. Cities Easier Targets for Terror
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/01/30/how-trump-is-making-u-s-cities-easier-targets-for-terror.html

This is the key point:



And this article, published in October, is starting to seem quite prescient:

Why President Trump Will Have Us All Carrying Federal ID Cards
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/08/why-president-trump-will-have-us-all-carrying-federal-id-cards.html


It appears that Gregg Phillips, the guy Trump cites on alleged voter fraud, agrees:




My Notes on Trump, Bannon, Lenin, and 'Enemies of the People'

On Friday, the current president of the United States, Donald Trump, blasted out a couple of tweets in which he cited what he called "FAKE NEWS" publications and networks, damning the media as "the enemy of the American people." 

It was an interesting choice of words for someone who is heavily influenced by Steve Bannon. As The Daily Beast reported in August, Breitbart's Bannon not too long ago claimed he wanted to emulate Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin and "destroy the state." Now he is the president's most powerful advisor.

Following is an excerpt from The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression, by Stephane Courtois et al, translated from the French and published by Harvard University Press in 1999:

















This is the tweet in question:
The day before, at the now infamous press conference where Trump vowed to speak past the reporters in the room to address "the American people," his efforts to dodge simple and direct questions were quite extraordinary, sometimes verged on the hallucinatory, and ultimately were self defeating. 

When a sympathetic Orthodox Jewish reporter, Jake Turx, working for Ami Magazine, a Jewish publication asked a carefully phrased question in which he said he did NOT believe Trump or anyone close to him is anti-Semitic, but wondered what the president would do to stop the marked rise in anti-Semitic attacks and threats in the U.S. since his election, Trump took this as a personal insult.

This is from the CNBC transcript:


... Trump: How much longer should we stay here, folks? Five more minutes, is that okay? Five? Wait, who is, I want to find a friendly reporter. Are you a friendly reporter?
Reporter: I'm friendly.
Trump: Watch how friendly, he is. Go ahead.
Reporter: So, first of all, my name is Jake [ inaudible ] magazine and, I, despite what so many colleagues might be reporting, I haven't seen anybody in my community accuse either yourself or anyone on your staff of being anti-semitic. However, what we are concerned about and what we haven't really heard you address is an uptick in anti-semitism and how in this climate you're going to take care of it. There have been reports out that 48 bomb threats have been made against Jewish centers all across the country in the last couple of weeks. There are people who are committing anti-semitic acts or threatening to --
Trump: You know he's said that he's going to ask a very simple, easy question. And it's not. It's not a fair question. Sit down. I understand the rest of your question. So here's the story, folks.
Number one, I'm the least anti-semitic person you've seen in your entire life. Number two, racism, the least racist person. In fact, we can very well relative to other people running as a Republican — [ inaudible ] [[Turx, still deferential, is trying to follow up]]
Quiet, quiet, he lied about getting up asking a straight, simple question, so, you know, welcome to the world of the media.
Let me just tell you something, that I hate the charge. I find it repulsive. I hate even the question because people that know me, and you heard the Prime Minister. You heard Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday. Did you hear him? Bebe, he said, "I've known Donald Trump for a long time. Then he said, forget it." So you should take that instead of having to get up and ask a very insulting question.
Go ahead.
Reporter: thank you, I'm Lisa — ...

It would have been so simple for Trump to say the government would not tolerate anti-Semitic incidents such as those described; the FBI is investigating, and so on. No. Somehow this question was about him.

But the strangest and most disturbing exchange, because it directly affects national security, came when the CBS White House correspondent Major Garrett asked about recent obvious provocations and tests of American resolve by Russia. Again, it was the kind of question that could have been batted down with reassuring platitudes. But no. Trump twisted the situation to blame the American press for Russian President Vladimir Putin's behavior, essentially letting Putin off the hook. Truly amazing ...:



Reporter: Mr. President, you mentioned Russia. Let's talk about some serious issues that have come up in the last week that you had to deal with as president of the United States.
Trump: Okay.
Reporter: You mentioned the spy vessel off the coast of the United States.
Trump: Not good.
Reporter: There was a ballistic missile test that many interpreted as...
Trump: Not good.
Reporter: ...a violation of an agreement between the two countries and a Russian plane buzzed a U.S. Destroyer.
Trump: Not good.
Reporter: I listen to you.
Trump: Excuse me, when did it happen? It happened when, if you were Putin, right now, you would say, hey, we're back to the old games with the United States. There's no way Trump can ever do a deal with us because the public — you have to understand, if I was just brutal on Russia right now, just brutal, people would say — you would say — oh that's wonderful, but I know you well enough, then you would say, oh, he was too tough, he shouldn't have done that. Look.
Reporter: I'm just trying to find out your orientation to those.
Trump: Excuse me.
Reporter: I'm just trying to find out what you'll do about it, Mr. President.
Trump: All the things you mentioned are recent because probably Putin assumed he cannot make a deal with me because it's politically not popular for me to make a deal, so Hillary Clinton tries to reset. It failed. They all tried.
But I'm different than those people, go ahead.
Reporter: How are you interpret those moves and what do you intend to do about them? Have you asked Rex Tillerson for any advice or counsel how to deal?
Trump: I have. I have and I'm so beautifully represented, I'm so honored that the senate approved him. He's gonna be fantastic.
Reporter: Is Putin testing you, do you believe, sir?
Trump: No I don't think so. I think Putin probably assumes that he can't make a deal with me anymore because politically it's unpopular for a politician to make a deal.
I can't believe I'm saying I'm a politician, but I guess that's what I am now. Look, it'd be much easier for me to be tough on Russia but then we're not going to make a deal. Now, I don't know that we're going to make a deal. I don't know. We might. We might not.
But it would be much easier for me to be so tough, the tougher I am on Russia, the better, but you know what? I want to do the right thing for the American people, and to be honest, secondarily, I want to do the right thing for the world. If Russia and the United States actually got together and got along, and don't forget, we're a very powerful nuclear country, and so are they.
There's no upside. We're a very powerful nuclear country and so are they. I've been briefed. I can tell you one thing about a briefing, that we're allowed to say because anybody that ever read the most basic book can say it, nuclear holocaust would be like no other. They're a very powerful nuclear country, and so are we. If we have a good relationship with Russia — believe me — that's a good thing, not a bad thing.
Reporter: So when you say they are not good, do you mean…
Trump: Who did I say is not good?
Reporter: No when I read off the three things that have recently happened each one of them you said are not good…
Trump: No, it's not good but they happen…
Reporter: Do they damage the relationship, undermine this country's ability to work with
Trump: They all happened recently, I understand what they are doing because they are doing the same thing.
Now, again, maybe I'm not going to be able to do a deal with Russia, but, at least, I will have tried, and if I don't, does anybody really think that Hillary Clinton would be tougher on Russia than Donald Trump? Does anybody in this room really believe that?
Okay. But I'll tell you one thing, she tried to make a deal. She had the reset. She gave all that valuable uranium away. She did other things. You know, they say I'm close to Russia. Hillary Clinton gave away 20% of the uranium in the United States. She's close to Russia. You know what I gave to Russia? You know what I gave? Nothing.
Reporter: Can we conclude there will be no response to these particular provocations?
Trump: I'm not going to tell you anything about what response I do. I don't talk about military response.
I don't say I'm going in Mosul in four months. "We are going to attack Mosul in four months." Then three months later, "we are going to attack Mosul in one month." "Next week, we are going to attack Mosul." In the meantime, Mosul is very very difficult.
You know why? Because I don't talk about military, and I don't talk about certain other things. You're going to be surprised to hear that. And, by the way, my whole campaign, I'd say that, so I don't have to tell you.
Reporter: Right, so there will be a response?
Trump: I don't have to tell you. I don't want to be one of those guys that says, "yes, here's what we're going to do." I don't have to do that. I don't have to tell you what I'm going to do in North Korea...
Reporter: In other words, there will be a response.
Trump: Wait a minute, I don't have to tell you what I'm going to do in North Korea. And I don't have to tell what I'm going to do with Iran. You know why? Because they shouldn't know.
And eventually, you guys are going to get tired of asking that question. So when you asked me, what am I going to do with the ship, the Russian ship as an example, I'm not going to tell you. But hopefully I won't have to do anything, but I'm not going to tell you. Okay.
Reporter: Thanks.

In point of fact, Trump got across his message very well to his core constituency. Putin's not the problem, he's not the problem. His tweet the next day was just a summation: the media are "the enemy of the American people."


Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Heading to Charleston for Two Talks About Two Very Different Spies, February 28 and March 2





Save the dates:


On February 28, I will be speaking at the College of Charleston about "Spying in the Blood: Gertrude Sanford Legendre's Privilege, Patriotism, and Espionage." I'll also look back at the work of her grandfather, Henry Shelton Sanford, who ran the Union's secret services in Europe during the Civil War. This is my recent article about Legendre, "The Socialite Spy Who Played So Dumb She Outsmarted the Nazis," which drew heavily on the digitized archives at the college.

On March 2,  it will be my honor to speak at the Charleston Library Society about my book, Our Man in Charleston: Britain's Secret Agent in the Civil War South, and the way the confidential dispatches of Consul Robert Bunch in the 1850s and '60s may relate to the present. (Much vital research for the book was conducted at the Library Society.) 



In that same talk I want to have some fun looking at people Consul Bunch almost certainly knew, but did not write about, including the slave Robert Smalls, a harbor pilot who stole the CSS Planter and turned it over to the blockading fleet, and Saint-Lo Mellichamp II, keeper of the Morris Island lighthouse in the early 1850s. Great characters with probable but, alas, undocumented connections. 






Trump's Dangerous War on Cities, and Why a National ID is Inevitable Under This Administration


This article appeared on Monday, wrapping up the events of the the weekend: 

How Trump is making U.S. Cities Easier Targets for Terror

This is the key point:



And this article, published in October, is starting to seem quite prescient:

Why President Trump Will Have Us All Carrying Federal ID Cards

It appears that Gregg Phillips, the guy Trump cites on alleged voter fraud, agrees:


Monday, January 30, 2017

Brian Jenkins on Terrorist Attack Numbers and Attribution

Brian Michael Jenkins, a veteran terrorism analyst with the RAND Corporation, is quoted extensively in my latest article, "Trump Makes U.S. Cities Less Safe." In it, he cites 89 deaths in the United States as a result of jihadist attacks since 9/11, and lists those atrocities one by one. In the following note, he explains why his numbers, nonetheless, are lower than those compiled by some other researchers:


As my 89 dead is well short of Charles Kurzman's (University of North Carolina) 124, I thought I would explain the difference.  First, Professor Kurzman includes the fatalities of the perpetrators (5), which I do not.  Kurzman also includes the following incidents that I exclude.

2002   Beltway sniper attacks  10 dead--but some link the perpetrators to 7 previous killings, so 17  (Muhammad may have wanted to disguise the murder of his ex-wife and Malvo was completely erratic in his writings after his imprisonment.  I think the scheme he described of kidnapping kids to build an army of terrorists was a fabrication.)

2006   Seattle Jewish Center shooting  (In my view, the shooter was angered by Israel and hated Jews, which does not make him a jihadist terrorist.)  1 dead

2007  Salt Lake City shopping mall shooting  5 dead  (No motive was ever established;  the FBI said it was not terrorism)

2014   Oklahoma Vaughn's Food beheading of a fellow employee  1dead (The killer had been fired just before the incident and one of his victims was the person who had complained about him.)

2014   Four murders in Seattle and New Jersey by Ali Muhammad Brown.  4 dead   (This might go into the data base as a terrorism charge was later added to the murder charges.  My view is that this was a street thug who tried to cloak his actions in religion.)

2014   Killing of two NYPD officers by Ismaaiyl Brinsley   2 dead  (Brinsley had a long history of arrests, was a black supremacist, and said his killings were in revenge for police slayings of blacks.)

If I were to add these 30 to my list, I would have 119, which, plus the 5 perpetrators killed, brings us to 124.  I would assert that every crackpot, street thug, or anti-semite killer who happens to be Muslim is not a jihadist terrorist, even if they later try to cloak their actions in religion.

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Covering Davos this Year From the Warmth of My Home In Paris


This post will be updated as Davos continues.


Day 3 - January 19 - E-mail from a sociologist taking part in the conference at Davos:

prez of China and IMF claiming that the populist wave is bucking the tide of history, which is still globalization despite the hiccups (seems a bit of an ostrich response). Xi angling himself as the grown up on the block and China as the engine of a more equitable "balanced and harmonious globalization" (as long as it's basically as China sees it).

Schwab, the originator of the WEF, saying that we need 2 things: 1. sublimating self interest to the common good (apart from Ayn rand turning in her grave like a lathe in response, one might ask "and what, exactly is the common good that can really motivate people to sacrifice?" Certainly not de-spiritualized globalization); and 2. that automatization and robotization should not leave humans in the lurch. So, what about all those lumpen laborers? Give them a guaranteed income while they retrain or retire (Really? not realizing that people with full stomachs, yet finding no purpose or significance, are much more likely to attempt revolution or resort to revolution than the poor).

Day 1

Davos Man Confronts Trumpocalypse

Davos selfie from years past

With Trump an enigma to the movers and shakers of the world, one country has stepped into the breach to seize the attention of the planet's most famous elite conference: China.

PARIS—The village of Davos in the Swiss Alps has seen a lot, but it has never seen anything quite like the impact of Donald Trump. As the men and women who used to be called (or call themselves) “masters of the universe” assemble there at the World Economic Forum this week, the man who will be sworn in as President of the United States in Washington on Friday remains for most of them a mystery wrapped in an enigma wrapped in a Twitter account.  ... MORE


Day 2


Explaining Trump to the Unsettled Elite


At Davos this year China’s premier appeared the un-Trumpian paladin of free trade, while the U.S. president-elect's "translator seemed unsure just what his boss believes.


PARIS — What a relief! The World Economic Forum in Davos learned today that everything’s going to be okay. President-Elect Donald Trump didn’t really dump all over Europe and its unifying institutions over the weekend, or, well, he did but he didn’t mean it like it sounded: NATO is only kind of “obsolete,” Germany’s Angela Merkel opening the door to migrants was a “catastrophe,” but Trump really respects her a lot. So the high and mighty were told on the Davos stage by his soon-to-be assistant in the White House “office of liaison,” Anthony Scaramucci.
And in case you were worried about a China-United States trade war under the new administration—nah. No less an authority than Chinese Premier Xi Xinping declared himself to be an ardent free-trader, strongly opposed to protectionism, the new incarnation (although he didn’t quite say this) of Davos Man.
Of course, if you believe all that, there are plenty of people with a couple of Alps to sell you. .... MORE 

----------------------------------------------------


Many thanks to Adrian Monck and the communications team at the World Economic Forum for making so many of the sessions available in their entirety on live-streaming and embedded video (See below for a scroll through the videos so far and a full list of upcoming talks.) 

From Day Two, going into Day Three:


Headlines

‘Defend the liberal international order.’ Joe Biden’s plea for the US.

Iran could play a larger role, says Foreign Minister Javad Zarif.

2016 was the hottest year ever. How to avoid climate catastrophe.

Inequality is dangerous. The IMF chief sounds the alarm -- again.

Colombia’s President Santos is an exceptional global statesman.

Did Obama fail? Actor & UNESCO envoy Forest Whitaker says no.

On the Agenda

Why it’s an Asian century, and how the west can benefit from it.

Europe’s security threats are rising. It’s not responding fast enough.

From Dada to Davos. How art can speak truth to power.

Without a country but with dignity. An Olympian refugee’s story.

Climate change in a post-truth world. Time for business to lead.

Checking email less is just a start. Fighting distraction at work.


Coming up today

You don’t have to be in Davos to follow what’s going on. We’re livestreaming over 120 sessions. Here are some of today’s highlights.

Britain after Brexit. British Prime Minister Theresa May will spell out the economic implications of leaving the European Union. 0915 GMT

Google founder Sergei Brin, on leadership, entrepreneurship and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. 1315 GMT

Which Europe?  Can Europe overcome its divisions and forge a common path? 1000 GMT

Cooperation for Peace: A New Vision for the United Nations. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres talks to World Economic Forum Chairman Klaus Schwab. 1500 GMT

Redefining Europe's Security Agenda. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg and a high-profile panel will discuss Europe's multiple security challenges. 1530 GMT


From Day One and going into Day Two, Monck recommends:

Most shared:
Chinese President Xi Jinping at Davos: in defence of globalization.
5 things you’ve got wrong about Donald Trump. According to one of his closest aides.
Should the US go cashless? Nobel Laureate Joseph Stiglitz thinks so.

On the Agenda:
National leaders are failing us. Is more globalization the answer?
8 rich men = 3.6 billion poor. The right ways to change this equation.
Populism’s antidote. Plural cities rethink politics and economics.
Left behind by automation and globalization? Answers are here.
Art really can change the world. Artists who lead social change.
Money for nothing? How a universal basic income can pay for itself.
Human rights are in retreat. But our social fabric needs them more than ever.
[
Coming up today:

Special address by Joe Biden, Vice President of the US. 1030 CET.
Iran the region and the world. with Javad Zarif, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Iran. 1100 CET
Fixing Europe’s Disunion. The European project is facing challenges. How to fix them? 1545 CET.
The Great American Divide. After a divisive election, how can the United States be reunited? 1800 CET.

Sunday, January 15, 2017

Recent Columns - From Richard Francis Burton in Boy Brothels to an American ambassador's parting shots




A Spy In the Brothels of Karachi 



—Apparently he wasn't a Santa at all ... and as far as I know he is still on the run, although the Turks are rounding up Uighurs
—On Jan 16 the Turks announced they had arrested (and apparently beat the shit out of) an Uzbek named Abdulkadir Masharipov.
Jan 6, 2017 2:15 PM EST

While cautious about fully embracing Donald Trump, France's far-right leader Marine Le Pen is... MORE

—And apparently Trump is wary of her, declining to receive her on her trip to New York last week. We reported she was on her way there after our sources texted us from the American Airlines plane she was on out of Paris. But it seems Trump's buddy Nigel Farage may have nixed a meeting.



Obama, Terror, and Trump: Parting Shots



—She was guarded in her remarks, and then she wasn't.


Saturday, December 24, 2016

ICYMI - Some Fascinating History for Holiday Reading

Angels of the Resistance

The Secret Agent Shrink vs. The Nazis


The Socialite Spy Who Played So Dumb She Outsmarted the Nazis

The Slave Who Stole the Reb Codes

The Black Spies in the Confederate White House [need to change article in hed and the woman in the picture is not in fact the woman we are writing about, whose photo does no exist)

The ‘Spider’ Who Nearly Wrecked the CIA

The Second Empire Strikes Back 

Les Tuileries: The Phantom Palace of Paris